Cases 21 - 30 of 11,087
Chapman v. City of Coos Bay, et al.
as 24-4972
Defendant:
PETER EMERSON KIRK, GARRY MCCULLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER CHAPANAR and others
Plaintiff:
ALLISON KATE CHAPMAN
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION v. COMPACT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv08451
Defendant:
ABC COMPANIES 1-10, STUDENT RESEARCH GROUP, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
PETER ANDREYEV, EDWIN MALDONADO, JUSTYNA MALONEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION v. COMPACT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv08451
Defendant:
STUDENT RESEARCH GROUP, HOMEDATA, PETER ANDREYEV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rodrigues v. Faricy et al
as 5:2024cv04896
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rodrigues
Defendant:
Thomas Werner, Elizabeth Eby and Peter Faricy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
TSOLKAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024cv02318
Plaintiff:
PETER TSOLKAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hoffman v. American Institute of Indian Studies
as 24-2100
Plaintiff:
PETER M. HOFFMAN, Trustee of the Albert B. Grossman Marital Trust
Intervenor:
NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant:
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF INDIAN STUDIES, a non-governmental organization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USSEC v. Reven Holdings, et al
as 24-1309
Defendant:
REVEN ONCOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, BRIAN D. DENOMME, HEALTH ANALYTICS AND RESEARCH SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Nicole Aaron et al v. Epson America, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01712
Petitioner:
Rick Allen, Dawn Adams, Nicole Aaron and others
Respondent:
Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
