Cases 21 - 25 of 25
University of Washington Medic, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 09-36044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL EVERETT, PROVIDENCE YAKIMA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
QUALITY REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS PF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS v. IMMUCOR, INC et al
as 2:2009cv04227
Plaintiff:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS PF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS and ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS PF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS
Defendant:
IMMUCOR, INC, OTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC., OTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
St. Francis Hospital, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Immucor, Inc., Ortho-Clinical, Diagnostics, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems
as 1:2009cv00509
Plaintiff:
St. Francis Hospital, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Immucor, Inc., Ortho-Clinical, Diagnostics, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, immucor, inc., Otho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
University of Washington Medical Center et al v. Leavitt
as 2:2007cv00394
Plaintiff:
University of Washington Medical Center, Providence Hospital Everett, Providence Yakima Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
USA v. Tenet Healthcare, et al
as 2:2003cv00206
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tenet Healthcare Corporation, National Medical Enterprises Inc, OrNda HealthCorp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
