Cases 21 - 30 of 382
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1009
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Oklahoma, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Meyer, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL KELLY MEYER
Plaintiff:
SAMS ANTICS INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, STATE OF NEBRASKA, MIKE HILGERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
State of Utah v. Su
as 23-11097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Bio Gen LLC, et al v. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, et al
as 23-3237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC, doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Governor; in her official capacity, Tim Griffin, Attorney General; in his official capacity, Todd Murray, in his official capacity as prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
