Cases 21 - 30 of 410
BAE Systems Norfolk Ship Repair Inc. v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through the DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, and its activity, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
BAE Systems Norfolk Ship Repair Inc.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through the DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, and its activity, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251 Public Contracts-Review of Agency Action
BECKER v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
CRAIG R BECKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hill v. Spencer
as 23-4348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMMIE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, United States Department of the Navy
Johnson v. Department of the Navy
as 3:2023cv02307
Plaintiff:
Lance Johnson
Defendant:
Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi Freedom of Information Act
ARANGO v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
as 1:2023cv03409
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN STEVEN J ARANGO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Carlborg v. Department of Navy et al
as 3:2023cv02073
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Carlborg
Defendant:
Department of the Navy and Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi Freedom of Information Act
Albert Fields, Jr. v. Dept of Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records
as 23-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT J. FIELDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
