Cases 21 - 30 of 37
United States of America v. the United States Post Office Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 23151670000014270959, further described in Attachment A
as 1:2017mc00434
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
the United States Post Office Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 23151670000014270959, further described in Attachment A
Best v. United States Post Office
as 1:2016cv07003
Plaintiff:
Timothy Best
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BRAUN v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv02079
Plaintiff:
DAVID STEVEN BRAUN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE and OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Adam Paul Strege v. United States Post Office
as 2:2015cv07405
Plaintiff:
Adam Paul Strege
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Nails v. Coat et al
as 1:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Cindy Coat, United States Post Office and Grandview Missouri Post Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Braun v. United States Post Office
as 2:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
David Steven Braun
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Williams v. United States Post Office et al
as 4:2014mc02473
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jay Williams
Defendant:
United States Post Office and Sharon Houston
Hughes v. Lambert et al
as 1:2014cv03999
Plaintiff:
Mary E Hughes
Defendant:
Cheryl Lambert, Connie Little, Claudette Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Narayanasamy v. United States Post Office
as 2:2014cv00032
Petitioner:
Lakshmi Narayanasamy
Respondent:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Watkins v. United States Post Office et al
as 0:2013cv61641
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
United States Post Office, Fort Lauderdale Main U.S. Post Office and Workers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
