Cases 21 - 30 of 53
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
City Of Austin v. State of Texas, et al
as 1:2017cv00843
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
City Of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 Housing Act
City of Austin v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00806
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Commission
City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas
as 5:2017cv00404
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton and State Of Texas
Movant:
City Of Austin
Plaintiff:
City of El Cenizo, Texas, Mario A. Hernandez, League Of United Latin American Citizens and others
Consol Plaintiff:
City of San Antonio, El Paso County, La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Judge Sarah Eckhardt, Sheriff Sally Hernandez and Travis County
Consol Defendant:
Steve McCraw and Texas Department of Public Safety
Amicu:
Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 17-1460
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, JOCELYN SAMUELS, NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
GIULIANO SILVA, DEE FULCHER and TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
United Motorcoach Assn, Inc. v. City of Austin
as 16-50115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED MOTORCOACH ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AUSTIN
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
Nemky v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03537
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nemky , Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment , City of Austin Retirement System and others
Respondent:
Trinity Industries Inc , Timothy R Wallace and James E Perry
Movant:
Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and United Association Local Union Officers & Employees Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
James Watson v. City of Allen, et al
as 15-90068
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JAMES H. WATSON, And Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS, CITY OF AUSTIN TEXAS, CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
