Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 608
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant: IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee: NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Western Digital Corporation v. SPEX Technologies, Inc.
as 19-1831
Appellant: WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION and others
Appellee: SPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CANON INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01680
Defendant: CANON INC. and TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company, L, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15538
Undetermined: CONNER ERWIN
Other: In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Kingston Technology Company v. SPEX Technologies, Inc.
as 19-1599
Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., APRICORN and others
Appellant: KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?