Cases 21 - 30 of 1,471
Telematica Lefic, S.A. De C.V. et al v. Socorro Marin, et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Telemtica Lefic, S.A. De C.V., Dyntra, S.A. De C.V., Rosa Maria Romero Vargas and others
Defendant:
Antonio J. Socorro Marin and Iquantics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vargas et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Martha Vargas and Raquel Ludim Ruiz
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and Secretary Antony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Fill RX NY Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Fill RX NY Inc., Bension Mosheyev, 167 RX Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Cano Velandia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner:
DEISY ANDRE CANO VELANDIA, JHOSETH SNAYDER VARGAS-CANO, KENNETH M VARGAS-CANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
David Gevas v. John Varga, et al
as 24-8006
Petitioner:
DAVID C. GEVAS
Respondent:
JOHN VARGA, SONJA NICKLAUS and JUSTIN WILKS
Vargas Panchi, et al v. Garland
as 24-1172
Petitioner:
MILTON GEOVANNY VARGAS PANCHI, AIDI VERONICA CONDOR LASSO, M. A. V.C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Camilo Vargas
as 24-10348
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAMILO ANDRES LANDAZUI VARGAS
Vargas Garzon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-528
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN A. VARGAS GARZON, KAREN S. TAMAYO NUNEZ and SARA VARGAS TAMAYO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
