Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Juan Rivas-Valdes v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70245
Petitioner:
JUAN FRANCISCO RIVAS-VALDES
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
Confederacion Hipica de PR, et al v. Confederacion de Jinetes PR, et al
as 20-2172
Defendant:
JESUS GUADALUPE, RAMON SANCHEZ, ALVIN COLON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAMARERO RACE TRACK CORP and CONFEDERACION HIPICA DE PUERTO RICO, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO M. SANCHEZ, STEVEN FRET, PEDRO GONZALEZ and others
Interested Party:
JOCKEYS' GUILD, INC.
Valdes v. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06042
Plaintiff:
Leonel Valdes
Defendant:
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc., Jehn Ming Lim, Zhu Xiaoying and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sun Commodities, Inc. v. JC Brokerage, Inc.
as 20-2075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUN COMMODITIES, INC., d/b/a Sun International Produce Co., d/b/a Global Maritime Supply
Defendant / Appellee:
ISLAND FRESH DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and JORGE MAYENDIA VALDES
Defendant / Appellant:
JC BROKERAGE, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
RUTH BERNAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Felix Valdes v. Lee Evans, et al
as 20-6095
Defendant:
BRAD BOYD, Jailer
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE LINDSEY HARPER, DOCTOR LEE A. EVANS and DOCTOR GERAME WELLS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIX VALDES
Jorge Valdes v. Nationwide Real Estate Executives, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01734
Defendant:
Nationwide Real Estate Executives, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jorge Valdes
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMEARICA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
