Cases 31 - 40 of 1,097
Stoicescu et al v. Layma, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv14387
Defendant:
Layma, LLC also known as Layama, LLC doing business as Little Lake Lending, Layama, LLC, Ben G. Ray, III and others
Plaintiff:
Jennene Stoicescu and Gail Wisinski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. v. Adroit Global USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14179
Plaintiff:
Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Adroit Global USA Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gerber v. Vital Rehabilitation Clinics & Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13898
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Vital Rehabilitation Clinics & Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McLaughlin v. Rosebud Lending DRT et al
as 1:2023cv05825
Plaintiff:
Joann McLaughlin
Defendant:
Rosebud Lending DRT, Princeton Alternative Funding, LLC, Princeton Alternative Income Fund, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gress v. A Plus Chiropractic, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Dr. William P. Gress
Defendant:
A Plus Chiropractic, PLLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schnefke v. Chao et al
as 3:2023cv02653
Plaintiff:
Katherine Schnefke
Defendant:
Stanley Chao, First Loan, NP Finance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hall v. Big Picture Loans, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04502
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hall
Defendant:
Big Picture Loans, LLC, Matt Martorello, Eventide Credit Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hohenbery v. Cascade Spring Credit et al
as 1:2023cv01236
Defendant:
Cascade Spring Credit, Raycen Raines, III, Cascade Springs Credit and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hohenbery
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Landwer v. Santana et al
as 1:2023cv03903
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Landwer
Defendant:
Eliezer Santana, Arbruster Habel and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Landwer v. Cabral et al
as 1:2023cv03679
Plaintiff:
Charles H Landwer
Defendant:
Fatima Cabral, Kimberlin Hernandez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
