Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Blos v. Blos
as 2:2014cv02196
Plaintiff: Michael Joachim Blos
Defendant: Jaime Elizabeth Blos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Joachim v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-24000
Plaintiff: Janet Sue Joachim
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
United States of America v. Hertenstein et al
as 2:2014mc00049
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Charles Frederick Hertenstein, III and Joachim Roehrich
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Joachim De Carlo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-04788
Plaintiff: Joachim De Carlo and Patricia De Carlo
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dartell v. Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03620
Plaintiff: Robin Joachim Dartell
Defendant: Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hong Yu, Taylor Z Guo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Carey v. Coty Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01107
Plaintiff: Norman C. Carey
Defendant: Coty Inc., Michele Scannavini, Sergio Pedreiro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stricker v. Coty Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00919
Plaintiff: Eugene Stricker
Defendant: Coty Inc., Michele Scannavini, Sergio Pedreiro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00074
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00037
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?