Cases 31 - 40 of 484
WDWGetaways, LLC v. Tanner et al
as 6:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
WDWGetaways, LLC
Defendant:
Christina Tanner and Ascension Travel, LLC
Deandre VickIn re: Deandre Vick
as 23-1228
Petitioner:
In re: DEANDRE VICK
Respondent:
JEFF TANNER, Warden
Kevin SutherbyIn re: Kevin Sutherby
as 23-1217
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN SUTHERBY
Respondent:
JEFF TANNER, Warden
USA v. John R. Moore, Jr., et al
as 23-10579
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TANNER J. MANSELL and JOHN R. MOORE, JR.
Hernandez et al v. Renaud et al
as 3:2022cv08213
Plaintiff:
Diana Lizeth Torres Hernandez and Jonathan Edward Tarutis Tanner
Defendant:
Tracy Renaud and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Leatrice Tanner-Brown, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leatrice Tanner-Brown, personal Representative of the Estate of George W. Curls, Sr., and of the Class of Similarly Situated Individuals and Harvest Institute Freedmen Federation, LLC, on behalf of itself and all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of the Interior and Tara Maclean Sweeney, Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs
Tanner v. Newton County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv03641
Plaintiff:
Candace Tanner
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff Dept. and Georgia Bureau Of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tanner v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Tabetha A. Tanner
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Tanner v. John C. Heath, et al.
as 3:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Whitney Tanner
Defendant:
John C. Heath dba Lexington Law, Progrexion Marketing, Inc., Efolks, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
