Cases 31 - 40 of 3,954
Camacho Carrillo, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2642
Plaintiff:
MONSERRAT CAMACHO CARRILLO and SAMUEL LOPEZ FLORES
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Flores Limon, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2584
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ FLORES LIMON and JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ REYES
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in her official capacity as well as her successor and assigns and others
Flores Segura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2513
Petitioner:
ERIC FRANK FLORES SEGURA, JOHANA ALEXANDRA VIGNOLO ESPINOZA, ARELY MARIANA FLORES VIGNOLO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Erick Flores-Turcios v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1338
Petitioner:
ERICK JESUS FLORES-TURCIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Aaron Flores Palacios v. Precision Anodizing and Plating, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Flores Palacios
Defendant:
Precision Anodizing & Plating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters
Sifuentes-Flores v. Garland
as 24-952
Petitioner:
KENJI JOSE SIFUENTES-FLORES, FIORELLA KATHERIN SANCHEZ-LANDA and HIROSHI KATSU SIFUENTES-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores Cubias v. Garland
as 24-2297
Petitioner:
ISMAEL ABDIEL FLORES CUBIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Heriberto Carbajal-Flores
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HERIBERTO CARBAJAL-FLORES
Jiminez-Flores v. Garland
as 24-930
Petitioner:
SANDRA ELIZABETH JIMINEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
