Cases 31 - 40 of 17,098
New York Times Company et al v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2024cv04226
Plaintiff:
New York Times Company and Mark Walker
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Watson v. Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool
as 7:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Watson
Defendant:
Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mark BrownIn re: Mark Brown
as 24-1994
Petitioner:
In re: MARK A. BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Mark David Spalenka v. David J. et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Mark David Spalenka
Defendant:
David J. Spalenka and Margie A. Spalenka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
One Barberry Real Estate Holding, LLC v. Maturo
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
ONE BARBERRY REAL ESTATE HOLDING, LLC, FARM RIVER ROCK, LLC and JOHN PATTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH MATURO, JR., CHRISTOPHER SOTO, MICHAEL MILICI and others
Pace O Matic Inc v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, et al
as 24-1984
Plaintiff:
PACE O MATIC INC
Defendant:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC, MARK S. STEWART and KEVIN M. SKJOLDAL
Appellant:
GREENWOOD GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT INC, DBA Parx Casino
Taylor v. Brown
as 24-3441
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
MARK D. BROWN
Gilscot-Guidroz International Co., Inc. v. Milek, et al
as 2:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Gilscot-Guidroz International Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Caroline Milek, Milekco International Co., Inc. and Mark Cameron Plato
United States of America v. Velez (Nelson)
as 24-1468
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Lawrence Sherman
as 24-1470
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAWRENCE MARK SHERMAN, M.D.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
