Cases 31 - 40 of 1,587
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
MONICA CAMILA ORTIZ PAI, LUCAS EDWARD MURPHY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MATTHEW M. GRAVES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Agustin Lucas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2226
Petitioner:
ANGELINA AGUSTIN LUCAS and YARITZA LILIANA JOSE AGUSTIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Deven Deschepper
as 24-1483
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEVEN LUCAS DESCHEPPER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bhavsar et al. v. Marsh et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, David Mindnich and others
Martinez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1126
Petitioner:
LUCAS SEBASTIAN MARTINEZ-VASQUEZ, JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ RAMIREZ, JULIA TAHOMY VASQUEZ MEJIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-489
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
ROLLIN COOK, Former Commissioner of Correction, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, Former District Administrator, BARONE, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. LUCAS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
LUCAS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
