Cases 31 - 40 of 963
Balistreri-Amrhein, et al v. Universal Insurance Company of North America, et al
as 4:2023cv00776
Defendant:
CEO Gary Moore, Universal Insurance Company of North America, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Solis-Reyes v. Garland
as 22-1024
Petitioner:
VICTORIANO SOLIS-REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bermudez-Solis, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1818
Petitioner:
WILBER ANTONIO BERMUDEZ-SOLIS, MIRIAM SUHEY ZAMORA-FONSECA and JEFFERSON JOSE BERMUDEZ-ZAMORA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Solis v. Garland
as 22-932
Petitioner:
ROLANDO LOPEZ-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Velez (William Gonzalez)
as 22-1243
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmelo Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Christopher Rodriguez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Luis Sepulveda, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
William Gonzalez
Macias-Solis v. Garland
as 21-368
Petitioner:
RICARDO MACIAS-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Candelaria Ajanel-Solis v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2733
Petitioner:
Candelaria Ajanel-Solis
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General for the United States
Solis v. GSF USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Hugo Solis
Defendant:
GSF USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
TORRES et al
as 1:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
MARINA TORRES, DANIEL SOLIS, EDGAR L. SANDERS, JR. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
