Cases 31 - 40 of 332
Castellanos Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1949
Petitioner:
BENITO CASTELLANOS GARCIA and ZENAIDA FENTANES MUNOZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Carlos Medina-Castellanos
as 22-7334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS JAVIER MEDINA-CASTELLANOS
Jeffrey Powers et al v. Denis Richard McDonough et al
as 2:2022cv08357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Powers, Deavin Sessom, Laurieann Wright and others
Defendant:
Denis Richard McDonough, Steven Braverman and Keith Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
USA v. Castellanos-Haro
as 22-50717
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Castellanos-Haro
USA v. Castellanos-Salamanca
as 22-40400
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Julio Anilber Castellanos-Salamanca, also known as Julio Castellanos Salamanca, also known as Criseldo Lopez, also known as Julio Castellanos, also known as Julio Anilber Castellanos, also known as Julio Amilcar Castellanos-Salamanca
USA v. Castellanos-Salamanca
as 22-40401
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Julio Anilber Castellanos-Salamanca
Shirley Remmert, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-15897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIRLEY VENOYA REMMERT
Plaintiff:
EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION and others
Alequin et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00765
Plaintiff:
Alequin, Deborah Kranz-Mitchell, Harvey Alequin and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Medina-Castellanos v. Garland
as 22-659
Petitioner:
FERNANDO MEDINA-CASTELLANOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
