Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Alan Jone
as 14-4002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALAN JONES, a/k/a Joshua Tucker, a/k/a Thomas Taylor, a/k/a Jonathan Williams, a/k/a Charles Miller, a/k/a Charles Brown, a/k/a Carter McClintock, a/k/a JD Tucker, a/k/a John Williams
Brown v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as WVS/6:13-cv-27513
Plaintiff:
Judith Brown and Charles Brown
Defendant:
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Anderson et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01663
Plaintiff:
John G Anderson , Daniel Carchidi , Howard Dunmire, Sr and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Brown v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01842
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BROWNING v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWNING
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA RETRIEVAL SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Dequillarae Zellou
as 13-1206
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEQUILLARAE ZELLOUS, aka Rae Zellous aka Strong aka Charles Brown aka Daryl Lewis aka Dequillarae Zellows aka Charles Warren
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
