Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
United Motorcoach Assn, Inc. v. City of Austin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-50115
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED MOTORCOACH ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF AUSTIN
Nemky v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03537
Plaintiff: Thomas Nemky , Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment , City of Austin Retirement System and others
Respondent: Trinity Industries Inc , Timothy R Wallace and James E Perry
Movant: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and United Association Local Union Officers & Employees Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
James Watson v. City of Allen, et al
as 15-90068
Plaintiff - Petitioner: JAMES H. WATSON, And Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Respondent: CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS, CITY OF AUSTIN TEXAS, CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS and others
James Watson v. City of Allen, Texas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-10732
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES H. WATSON, And Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS, CITY OF AMARILLO TEXAS, CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS and others
Isolde v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02093
Plaintiff: Richard J Isolde and City of Austin Retirement System
Defendant: Trinity Industries Inc , Timothy R Wallace and James E Perry
Movant: The Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment , Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and United Association Local Union Officers & Employees Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Auspro Enterprises, LP v. City of Austin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff: Auspro Enterprises, LP
Defendant: City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Watson v. City of Allen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00335
Plaintiff: James H Watson
Defendant: City of Allen, Texas , City of Amarillo, Texas, City of Arlington, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fire and Police Pension Assoc, et al v. Abiomed, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1502
Plaintiff: OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, CITY OF HOLLYWOOD (FL) EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT FUND, TULARE COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: FIRE AND POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO and CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee: ABIOMED, INC, MICHAEL R. MINOGUE and ROBERT L. BOWEN
Movant - Interested Party: POLICEMENS ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?