Cases 31 - 40 of 1,887
Daigle v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Derwin Daigle
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Pulliam v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Justin Pulliam
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hernandez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
David Hernandez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc Removal- Breach of Contract
Gurrola et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv03438
Plaintiff:
Ricardo B. Gurrola and Marleinet T. Gurrola
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ford Motor Company v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv11286
Plaintiff:
Ford Motor Company
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Petitioner:
Felix Brizuela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jose Franco et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jose Franco and George Franco
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
VONRUEDGISCH v. Ford Motor Company
as 6:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
JAMES VONRUEDGISCH
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Safe Driving Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company
as 23-1941
Appellant:
SAFE DRIVING TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
MARTINEZ v. Ford Motor Company
as 7:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
NANCY MARTINEZ
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ford Motor Company v. Safe Driving Technologies LLC
as 23-1870
Appellant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Appellee:
SAFE DRIVING TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
