Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Carolina Power & Light Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2009cv00190
Defendant:
The Holladay Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina Power & Light Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Florida Municipal Power Agency v. FERC
as 09-1060
Petitioner:
Florida Municipal Power Agency
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Florida Power & Light Company
Gulf South Pipeline Company v. FERC
as 09-1022
Petitioner:
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Florida Power & Light Company
United States v. Florida Power & Light Company, et al
as 08-3885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant:
B & D Electric, Inc., Cardinal Electric Motor Repair, Inc., Flanders Electric Motor Services, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Florida Power & Light Company and Interstate Power and Light, successor-in-interest formerly known as Interstate Power Company
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00463
Defendant:
Veolia Environmental Services Waste-to-Energy, Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter
3Rd Party Defendant:
The North Carolina Granite Corporation, FABRI-KAL Corporation, The National Lime and Stone Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cross Defendant:
Electric Equipment Corporation of Virginia, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Bowers v. Bartlett Nuclear, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00566
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Bowers
Defendant:
Bartlett Nuclear, Inc. and Florida Power & Light Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CT Dept. of Public Utility v. FERC
as 08-1199
Petitioner:
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Maine Public Utilities Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Braintree Electric Light Department, Massachusetts Attorney General, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition
United States of America v. Atlanta Gas Light Company et al
as 6:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Atlanta Gas Light Company, City of Sanford, Florida Power & Light Company and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Florida Power & Light Company v. FERC
as 08-1062
Petitioner:
Florida Power & Light Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
BP Energy Company, Chevron USA, Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
