Cases 31 - 40 of 1,266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Floyd v. Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Armando Anido, Warren D. Cooper and others
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Julie Barfuss v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-80068
Petitioner:
JULIE BARFUSS, RANDY FLOYD BARFUS, RUMER HENRY` and others
Respondent:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER L.L.C.
Johnson v. Trump
as 23-1276
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Floyd v. Quotient Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Quotient Technology, Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Floyd Steve Bales et al v. Freedom Forever, LLC
as 5:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Floyd Steve Bales and Edward Newman, Jr.
Defendant:
Freedom Forever, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
FloydIn re: Floyd
as 23-2395
Appellant:
In re: BONNIE IRIS MCDONALD FLOYD
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
United States of America v. Best
as 23-906
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FLOYD DEAN BEST, JR.
Ricardo EdmondsIn re: Ricardo Edmonds
as 23-1748
Petitioner:
In re: RICARDO WARREN EDMONDS
Respondent:
MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
