Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Baltimore Fire Officers Union v. Mayor and City Council
as 13-1115
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. CHERRY, JR., ROBERT J. SLEDGESKI, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALTIMORE FIRE OFFICERS UNION, LOCAL 964, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FIRE AND POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, a body politic and corporate, EDWARD J. GALLAGHER, in his capacity as Director, Department of Finance and THOMAS P. TANEYHILL, in his capacity as Executive Director, Fire and Police Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Robert Cherry, Jr. v. Mayor and City Council
as 13-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT F. CHERRY, JR., ROBERT J. SLEDGESKI, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
BALTIMORE FIRE OFFICERS UNION, LOCAL 964, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FIRE AND POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, a body politic and corporate, EDWARD J. GALLAGHER, in his capacity as Director, Department of Finance and THOMAS P. TANEYHILL, in his capacity as Executive Director, Fire and Police Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Robert Cherry, Jr. v. Mayor and City Council
as 13-1007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT F. CHERRY, JR., ROBERT J. SLEDGESKI, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
BALTIMORE FIRE OFFICERS UNION, LOCAL 964, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Defendant - Appellant:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FIRE AND POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, a body politic and corporate, EDWARD J. GALLAGHER, in his capacity as Director, Department of Finance and THOMAS P. TANEYHILL, in his capacity as Executive Director, Fire and Police Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Movant:
BRIAN CHARLES VAETH
Sharon Hall, et al v. Lynne Callahan, et al
as 12-3708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON HALL and JAMES CODY
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNNE S. CALLAHAN, in her official capacity, PATRICIA A. COSGROVE, in her official capacity, PAUL J. GALLAGHER, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Reardon et al v. The Most Reverend Thomas Wenski et al
as 1:2011cv24606
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Reardon, Q.I.S. Management LLC and W.B. Care Center, LLC
Defendant:
The Most Reverend Thomas Wenski, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Miami, A Corporation Sole and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hall, et al v Callahan, et al
as 5:2011cv01740
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hall and James Cody
Defendant:
Lynne S. Callahan , Paul J. Gallagher , Judy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gallagher
as 1:2011mc00122
Appellant:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Daniel J. Gallagher
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
-OP The Humane Society of the United States v. Hallmark Meat Packing Company et al
as 5:2008cv00221
Cross Defendant:
Cattleman's Choice, Inc., M & M Management, LLC, Anthony Magidow and others
Unknown:
James J Gallagher and James J Gallagher
213) 622-2690 (fax:
Mark R Troy and Mark R Troy
Defendant:
Cattleman's Choice, Inc., Does, Donald R. Hallmark and others
Cross Claimant:
Donald R. Hallmark, Donald W. Hallmark and Hallmark Meat Packing Company
Intervenor Defendant:
M & M Management, LLC and Walter S. Weiss
Plaintiff:
The Humane Society of the United States States
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
