Cases 31 - 40 of 152
In re: Jonathan Jackson
as 12-6221
Movant:
In re: JONATHAN LEE JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Moore v. Cardinal Financial Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01824
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore
Defendant:
Cardinal Financial Company, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., E & W Realty, LLC and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Jonathan Riches v. Brad Pitt, et al
as 12-1725
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD PITT, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
In Re: PAR Pharmaceutical
as 12-2542
Defendant - Appellee:
In re: PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES INC, SCOTT L. TARRIFF, DENNIS J. O'CONNOR and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and SNOW CAPITAL INVESTMENT PARTNERS
Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
L.I. Head Start C, et al v. Economic Opportunity, et al
as 2:2000cv07394
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams and L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Economic Opportunity Commission Of Nassau County, Inc., Economic Opportunity Council of Suffolk, Inc., John L. Kearse and others
Movant:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
US v. Jonathan Thompson
as 12-4310
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE THOMPSON
Kardashian et al v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06568
Plaintiff:
Kim Kardashian and KimsAPrincess Inc
Defendant:
The Gap Inc, Old Navy LLC, Old Navy Apparel LLC and others
Intervenor:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jonathan Riches v. Arthur Agatston, et al
as 11-10354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR AGATSTON, MD, JOSEPH SIGNORILE and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Jonathan Riches v. Stuart Rosoff, et al
as 10-2200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
STUART ROSOFF, aka Michael Knight, CHAD WARD, aka Dark Angel, JASON TROWBRIDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
