Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Christopher Julian v. USDA
as 14-1480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN and RENEE G. JULIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer, RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager and others
King v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-24829
Plaintiff:
Donna L. King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Abney et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-02557
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Abney , Therese Andrezewski , Arthur Lee Archer and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and others
King et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-11982
Plaintiff:
Deborah Chappell King and Bobby L. King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
King v. Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC and Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. and Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Jeffrey King
as 12-4564
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY L. KING
King v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as MOW/4:12-cv-00580
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Plaintiff:
Ann M. King and Joey L. King
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
