Cases 31 - 40 of 278
Richard Broome v. Ricky Scaman, et al
as 19-51161
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE FNU MCCARVER, SHERIFF RICKY SCAMAN, CAPTAIN FNU NEARING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD RAY BROOME
Charles Denham, et al v. Donato Tramuto, et al
as 19-6316
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM HOLLAND, MARY JANE ENGLAND, DONATO TRAMUTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW H. ALLEN, Derivatively and on Behalf of the Nominal Defendant TIVITY HEALTH, INC and CHARLES DENHAM, Derivatively on Behalf of TIVITY HEALTH, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TIVITY HEALTH, INC. STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Mark Albrechtsen v. Brandon Laughlin, et al
as 19-2796
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON LAUGHLIN and CHRISTOPHER WALTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Calvin White v. Homer Laughlin China Co.
as 19-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN L. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
HOMER LAUGLIN CHINA CO. and HOMER LAUGHLIN CHINA CO.
Bradley A Malkin Family LP et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2019mc00027
Plaintiff:
Bradley A Malkin and Bradley A Malkin Family LP
Not Yet Classified:
Diana Mullen
Defendant:
AZ 20 LLC, Laughlin River Parcel A LLC, AZ 25 LLC and others
The Bradley A. Malkin Family Limited Partnership et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2019cv01342
Defendant:
AZ 11, LLC, J. Mario Sanchez, I-8 & Thornton, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley A. Malkin and The Bradley A. Malkin Family Limited Partnership
Interested Party:
Robert Strimling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Patricia Hannah v. Ronald Laughlin
as 19-12804
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD LAUGHLIN
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PATRICIA HANNAH, as plenary legal guardian of Darryl Vaughn Hanna, Jr., an individual
Laughlin et al v. Optum360, LLC et al
as MN/0:19-CV-01661
Defendant:
Optum360, LLC
Plaintiff:
Laughlin
Laughlin et al v. Monsanto Company
as MN/0:19-CV-01657
Plaintiff:
Laughlin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
