Cases 31 - 40 of 55
USA v. Jose Silerio-Ramirez
as 12-50503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS SILERIO-RAMIREZ
Jorge Madgaleno Ramirez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72766
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS MADGALENO RAMIREZ, AKA Jorge Luis Magdaleno Ramirez and ANA CLAUDIA MADGALENO, AKA Ana Claudia Magdaleno
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Perez-Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72076
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS PEREZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
US v. Luis Tejeda-Ramirez
as 11-7438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS TEJEDA-RAMIREZ
Roman-Rivera et al v Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority et al
as 3:2011cv02003
Plaintiff:
Dario E. Roman-Rivera , Argelia Sineriz-Puig , Robert R. Grossman and others
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Otoniel Cruz-Carrillo, Miguel A. Cordero-Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
USA v. Luis Montoya-Ramirez
as 11-30158
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS MONTOYA-RAMIREZ
United States v. Ramirez-Fragozo
as 11-6086
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS ENRIQUE RAMIREZ-FRAGOZO
USA v. Ramirez-Leyva et al
as 8:2011mj00081
Material Witne:
Juan Antonio Balbuena-Gonzalez, Juan Noe Chagoya-Delgado, Luciano Gonzalez-Ordones and others
Defendant:
Fernando Martinez-Cuevas (2) and Erick Ramirez-Leyva (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Erick Ramirez-Leyva
as 8:2011mj00081
Material Witne:
Juan Antonio Balbuena-Gonzalez, Juan Noe Chagoya-Delgado, Luciano Gonzalez-Ordones and others
Defendant:
Erick Ramirez-Leyva (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Fernando Martinez-Cuevas
as 8:2011mj00081
Material Witne:
Juan Antonio Balbuena-Gonzalez, Juan Noe Chagoya-Delgado, Luciano Gonzalez-Ordones and others
Defendant:
Fernando Martinez-Cuevas (2)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
