Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Brooks v. Williams
as 19-421
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael C. Lynch, New York State Appellate Court Judge, Justice William E. McCarthy, New York State Appellate Court Judge, Donald Williams, New York State Supreme Court Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Brooks
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Rosenfeld v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00213
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Mark T. Bertolini, Fernando Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Inzlicht-Sprei v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
Eli Inzlicht-Sprei
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Mark T. Bertolini, Frank M. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REV. TRUST v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REV. TRUST
Defendant:
AETNA, INC., FERNANDO AGUIRRE, MARK T. BERTOLINI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pham v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Luan Pham
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Mark T. Bertolini, Ellen M. Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
FREEDMAN v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FREEDMAN
Defendant:
AETNA, INC., MARK T. BERTOLINI, ELLEN M. HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stein v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Mark T. Bertolini, Ellen M. Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Miramond v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Olivier Miramond
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Mark T. Bertolini, Ellen M. Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
