Cases 31 - 40 of 960
D. Deaton, et al v. Agnes Chappell, et al
as 23-13622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D. DEATON, T. PEAKE, J.K.D. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AGNES CHAPPELL, PATRICIA STEPHENS, ALISHA RUFFIN MAY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BAY AREA CHRISTIAN COUNSELING, LLC and KIRK.DRENNAN P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Weinberg v. Alexander Madison Realty, Inc.
as 2:2023cv07741
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Weinberg
Defendant:
Alexander Madison Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Danny Madison
as 23-3210
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Danny Ray Madison
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. Cindy Vandivier
as 23-13075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CINDY VANDIVIER, a.k.a. Madison Brooke, a.k.a. Madison Brookes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Heeren v. Madison Reed, Inc.
as 1:2023cv06424
Plaintiff:
Courtney Heeren
Defendant:
Madison Reed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
