Cases 31 - 40 of 72
USA v. Frank Marley, III
as 14-11999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK EXCEL MARLEY, III
US v. Vicente-Aria
as 13-2500
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE RAMON VICENTE-ARIAS, a/k/a Jose Vicente-Arias, a/k/a Bob Marley
Thomas Uhlig v. Drayprop, LLC, et al
as 13-14989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS UHLIG
Defendant - Appellee:
DRAYPROP, LLC, DRAYPARK, LLC, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-56691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02320
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris Baking Company v. Darby Bank & Trust Co., et al
as 12-12360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRIS BAKING COMPANY, f.k.a. Regency Baking Company
Defendant - Appellee:
DARBY BANK & TRUST CO., DRAYPROP, LLC, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Jim Hunt v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, et al
as 12-12363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM HUNT, trading as the Hunt Club Clothiers
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of the business and property of Darby Bank & Trust Co., DARBY BANK & TRUST CO., DRAYPROP, LLC and others
Drayprop, LLC, et al v. Darby Bank & Trust Co., et al
as 12-12359
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
HARRIS BAKING COMPANY, a.k.a. Regency Baking Company
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
MICHAEL BROWN, DRAYPROP, LLC and MARLEY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
:
SERVICE
Warren Lokey v. Drayprop, LLC, et al
as 12-12299
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WARREN LOKEY
Defendant - Appellant:
DRAYPROP, LLC, DRAYPARK, LLC, MICHAEL BROWN and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
