Cases 31 - 40 of 1,335
Douglas Menjivar Mejia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1183
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JAVIER MENJIVAR MEJIA, RUTH NOEMY RIVERA DE MENJIVAR, BRANDON STEVEN GAMEZ RIVERA and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mejia-De Marquez v. Garland
as 24-60045
Petitioner:
Paola Eunice Mejia-De Marquez and Edgardo Ezequiel Marquez-Mejia
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Angel Mejia
as 24-1032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL MEJIA
Urias-Orellana, et al v. Garland
as 24-1042
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS HUMBERTO URIAS-ORELLANA, SAYRA ILIANA GAMEZ-MEJIA and G.E.U.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mejia Cruz v. Garland
as 24-10
Petitioner:
INGRIS YOSELIN MEJIA CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mejia, et al. v. Jaddou, et al.
as 23-4345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VITO MEJIA and THELMA MEJIA
Defendant / Appellee:
UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 5, inclusive
Maria Mejia Ponce, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-14124
Petitioner:
MARIA FATIMA MEJIA PONCE and WALTER ESTEBAN CRUZ MEJIA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castejon Rios, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4258
Petitioner:
KEYLI SAMARA CASTEJON RIOS and BRANDO ALEJANDRO MEJIA CASTEJON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams v. Minev, et al.
as 23-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MINEV, R. DONNELLY, B. EGERTON and others
Mejia Nunez v. Searls
as 23-7980
Petitioner:
JORDY HERBERT MEJIA NUNEZ
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
