Cases 31 - 40 of 784
GAINESVILLE RESIDENTS UNITED, INC. et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 1:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
GAINESVILLE RESIDENTS UNITED, INC., IRVING W WHEELER, JR, ROBERT HUTCHINSON and others
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, CORD BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moody v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc
as 6:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Alphonze Moody
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc, Trans Union, LLC and Fifth Third Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Peller v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Melvin Peller
Defendant:
Anthony K. Anderson, Ann C. Berzin, Laurie Brlas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez v. State of Florida et al
as 9:2023cv80855
Plaintiff:
Suzette Grace Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of Florida, Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michael Moody v. TikTok, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02465
Defendant:
TikTok Inc., Musical.LY.Inc. and ByteDance Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Moody
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
US v. Edward Moody, Jr.
as 23-6386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD LEE MOODY, JR.
US v. Harry Moody
as 23-6319
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRY NOLAN MOODY
Wentworth Management Services, LLC v. Beckingham et al
as 1:2023cv02660
Plaintiff:
Wentworth Management Services, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Beckingham, June Beckingham, Keith L. Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
