Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHAPMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PROFESSIONAL BUREAU OF COLLECTIONS OF MARYLAND, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv02148
Plaintiff:
AVONNA CHAPMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL BUREAU OF COLLECTIONS OF MARYLAND, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vallot v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
Lee Vallot
Defendant:
Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc. and Cascade Receivables Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scarlett Cerutti v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01813
Plaintiff:
Scarlett Cerutti
Defendant:
Does and Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Mark Legacy v. Kabbage, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01694
Defendant:
DOES, Kabbage, Inc. and Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Legacy
Michael South v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05776
Defendant:
Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael South
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
