Cases 31 - 40 of 1,633
NLRB v. Metrohealth Inc.
as 23-1331
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Metrohealth Inc., d/b/a Hospital Metropolitano Rio Piedras
USA v. Rios-Mares
as 23-11181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gael Oswaldo Rios-Mares
United States of America v. Del Rio
as 23-3545
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDGAR DEL RIO
USA v. Rios
as 23-50785
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alexander Emmanuel Rios
Rios v. United States Customs and Border Protection
as 24-1103
Petitioner:
J. JESUS RIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Metrohealth Inc. v. NLRB
as 23-1301
Petitioner:
Metrohealth Inc., d/b/a Hospital Metropolitano Rio Piedras
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Guardian Ad Litem Tiffany Starcevich
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Innovative Climatic Technologies Corporation v. Rios Cargo LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02150
Plaintiff:
Innovative Climatic Technologies Corporation a Nevada corporation doing business as Air2O
Defendant:
Rios Cargo LLC, Selene Rios, Jose Armando Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA v. Rios-Duran
as 23-11031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mariano Rios-Duran, also known as Mariano Duran Rios, also known as Mariano Rios
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. GEG, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
GEG, LLC doing business as V Lounge doing business as V Lounge San Antonio doing business as Rio Azul and Eduardo A. Cervantes doing business as V Lounge doing business as V Lounge San Antonio doing business as Rio Azul
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
