Cases 31 - 40 of 362
Sheppard v. Collum
as 21-40920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael A. Collum, Spencer Lucas, Derek Light and others
Sheppard v. Lucas
as 21-40919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Sheppard
Defendant / Appellee:
Lucas, Major, Light, Captain, Collins, Warden and others
US v. Marquay Sheppard
as 21-4666
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUAY QUAMAINE SHEPPARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barbara Howe, et al v. County of Mendocino, et al
as 21-16665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA HOWE, L. JANI SHEPPARD and CAROL MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, TAMMY MOSS CHANDLER, WILLIAM SCHURTZ and others
YOUNG v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
DR. S. STANLEY YOUNG, S. STANLEY YOUNG and LOUIS ANTHONY COX, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Raymond Bradford v. P. Bracamonte, et al
as 21-56087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
P. BRACAMONTE, Facility C Captain, W. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant, L. STEEL, Correctional Officer and others
Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. Zack Hawthorn
as 21-2552
Petitioner:
CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR.
Respondent:
ZACK HAWTHORN
Markis Sheppard v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-12470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKIS ANTONI SHEPPARD
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA, in its Official Capacity, MICHELLE SCHOUEST and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
