Cases 31 - 40 of 279
Dayan v. Levy et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Counter Defendant:
Edward Dayan
Counter Claimant:
Elie Levy, Michael Kassin, Sportlife Brands, LLC and others
E. M. v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as CAC/2:22-CV-09410
Plaintiff:
E. M.
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC
Connie Curts v. Edgewell Personal Care Company, et al
as 22-8021
Respondent:
Connie Curts, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
Edgewell Personal Care Company, Edgewell Personal Care, LLC, Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and others
Carroll v. Mattel Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08954
Plaintiff:
Keith Carroll
Defendant:
Mattel Inc. and American Girl Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as OHN/1:22-CV-02139
Plaintiff:
Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC
Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02139
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jane Doe 1 by and through her mother, Mary Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as FLM/6:22-CV-02146
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 by and through her mother, Mary Doe
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC
Jane Doe 2 by and through her mother, Mary Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as FLM/6:22-CV-02147
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2 by and through her mother, Mary Doe
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC
Jane Doe 3 by and through her father, Joseph Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as FLM/6:22-CV-02149
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3 by and through her father, Joseph Doe
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC
Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04489
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
