Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 889
Joan Davis v. The Office of Bar Admissions, et al
as 23-14236
Plaintiff: JOAN P. DAVIS
Defendant: DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS, of the Georgia Supreme Court, in his individual capacity, HEIDI M. FAENZA, Director of Admissions of the Office of Bar Admissions, in her individual capacity and JOHN C. SAMMON, Chairman of the Board to Determine Fitness of Bar Applicants, in his individual capacity
Lorrie Sue McClary v. San Bernardino Juvenile Court et al
as 5:2023cv02644
Plaintiff: Lorrie Sue McClary
Defendant: San Bernardino Juvenile Court, San Bernardino Superior Court, State of California Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Ruth v. Thompson West Group Publishing, et al.
as 23-4425
Plaintiff / Appellant: EBER G RUTH
Defendant / Appellee: THOMPSON WEST GROUP PUBLISHING, MADERA COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURT, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS and others
Torres v. Adult Probation
as 23-8084
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY TORRES
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICE OF ADULT PROBATION, Court Support Services (CSSD) Connecticut Superior Court, State of Connecticut, NICOLE GRELLA, COURTNEY RING and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-25 and OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Supreme Court Building, State of Connecticut
In Re: Bernardo
as 23-8048
Respondent: JOSEPH P. BERNARDO
Interested Party: PR SUPREME COURT
In Re: Maldonado-Trinidad
as 23-8043
Respondent: JOSE A. MALDONADO-TRINIDAD
Interested Party: PR SUPREME COURT
In Re: Wellman-Ally
as 23-8042
Respondent: LISA A. WELLMAN-ALLY
Interested Party: NH SUPREME COURT
In Re: Sheridan
as 23-8046
Respondent: WILLIAM C. SHERIDAN
Interested Party: NH SUPREME COURT
In Re: McDaniel
as 23-8045
Respondent: ROBERT E. MCDANIEL
Interested Party: NH SUPREME COURT
In Re: Ocasio Bravo
as 23-8044
Respondent: RODOLFO G. OCASIO BRAVO
Interested Party: PR SUPREME COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?