Cases 31 - 40 of 69,561
HARRIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
KAMILLA M. HARRIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
VOLMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
VOLMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PASCHALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
ALICIA PASCHALL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SYGNOS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
SYGNOS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
ALAYSHA D. CLARK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF COLORADO, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA et al v. ExxonMobil Pipeline Company LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
USA, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company LLC and Mobil Pipe Line Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 24-1911
Not Yet Classified:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC and KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, AKA Kinney Drugs Inc
Defendant:
AMGEN INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC and others
CARTHAN et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
BILLY CARTHAN, DAVIS DENTON, CLAY GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Yessaian v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, et al.
as 24-3418
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. YESSAIAN
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and ADVANCED ACCELERATOR APPLICATIONS USA INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
