Cases 31 - 40 of 1,622
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES et al v. IBEW LOCAL 1600
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES and PPL SERVICES CORPORATION
Defendant:
IBEW LOCAL 1600
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crystal Clear v. HK Baugh Ranch
as 23-50928
Plaintiff:
Crystal Clear Special Utility District
Intervenor:
HK Baugh Ranch, L.L.C.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, et al v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC, et al
as 1:2023mc00034
Respondent:
Houlihan Lokey Financial Advisors, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rogers v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN F. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1330
Petitioner:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., Long Island Power Authority and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Spencer v. Tim et al
as 0:2023cv62214
Plaintiff:
Darline S. Spencer
Defendant:
McCormick Tim, Future Infrastructure Holdings, LLC, Cardinal Contractors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 ET, AL. v. DB UTILITY CONTRACTORS, LLC
as 2:2023mc00143
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174, ET AL.
Defendant:
DB UTILITY CONTRACTORS, LLC doing business as D&B UTILITY, INC.
Utility Solid Waste Activities Group v. EPA
as 23-1300
Petitioner:
Utility Solid Waste Activities Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
