Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15300
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Objector - Appellant:
BARRY HIMMELSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. and others
United States Of America et al v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00580
Defendant:
American Express Co., American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., Class Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221 and others
Respondent:
American Express Co. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Connecticut, State of Hawaii and others
Movant:
Texas Historical Commission
United States of America et al v. American Express Company et al.
as 1:2010cv04496
Interested Party:
Individual Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221, Juniper Bank, All Plaintiffs in and others
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court:
Citibank, N.A., Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
US Airways, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc, PayPal, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Express Company, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Material Witne:
Jetblue Airways Corporation
Intervenor:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Joseph Shanis v. Putnam Investments Trust
as 09-1792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH SHANIS and LEAD PLAINTIFF OHIO TUITION TRUST AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
DIANE SAUNDERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, THOMAS W. FORSTER, THE CITY OF SUNRISE GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PUTNAM INVESTMENTS TRUST, PUTNAM INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, JAMES PRUSKO and others
Defendant - None:
PUTNAM FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY, PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INCORPORATED, LINCOLN FINANCIAL ADVISORS CORPORATION and others
Movant - None:
JILL LYNN BAILIN, PUTNAM FUNDS, JOANNE S. BASEMAN and others
In Re: Mushroom Direct
as 09-2258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC and GIANT EAGLE INC
Defendant:
FRANKLIN FARMS INC, CREEKSIDE MUSHROOMS, JM FARMS INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. BASCIANI & SONS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MUSHROOM COOPERATIVE DEFENDANTS
In Re: Mushroom Direct
as 09-2257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC and GIANT EAGLE INC
Defendant - Appellant:
MUSHROOM COOPERATIVE DEFENDANTS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN FARMS INC, CREEKSIDE MUSHROOMS, JM FARMS INC and others
:
KITCHEN PRIDE MUSHROOMS
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. BASCIANI & SONS INC
In Re: Universal Service Fund, et al v. AT&T Corporation, et al
as 09-3077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLASS PLAINTIFFS, Thomas F. Cummings; Roger A. Gerdes; Sterling Beimfohr d/b/a Sterling Sails
Plaintiff:
IN RE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND TELEPHONE BILLING PRACTICE LITIGATION
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATION
Respondent:
HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP
Objector:
GEORGE HATTAWAY, PAM HATTAWAY, FKA Pam Holloway and T. J. ADAMCZYK
Universal Service, et al v. AT&T Corporation, et al
as 09-3059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLASS PLAINTIFFS, Thomas F. Cummings; Roger A. Gerdes; Sterling Beimfohr d/b/a Sterling Sails
Respondent:
HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP
Plaintiff:
IN RE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND TELEPHONE BILLING PRACTICE LITIGATION
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T CORPORATION
Objector:
GEORGE HATTAWAY, PAM HATTAWAY, FKA Pam Holloway and T. J. ADAMCZYK
In Re: Elec Carbon, et al
as 08-1124
Plaintiff - Appellee:
METRO N RR, NYC TRANS AUTH, LONG ISLAND RR and others
Not Party - Appellant:
CLASS PLAINTIFFS, KIDD MACHINE MFG, AERO ACCESSORIES INC and others
In Re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2007mc00119
Plaintiff:
Choline Chloride Class Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Ducoa L.P. and DCV Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
