Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Harvey v. Apple Inc.
as CAN/5:17-cv-07274
Plaintiff:
Keaton Harvey
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Movant:
Nicole Gallmann
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Inc. v. Diesel Power Gear LLC et al
as 4:2017mc00061
Plaintiff:
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Inc.
Defendant:
Diesel Power Gear LLC, 4X4 Anything LLC, B&W Auto LLC and others
USA v. Alton Keaton, Jr.
as 17-50251
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALTON EDWARD KEATON, JR., also known as Alton Edward Keaton
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. DIESELSellerz.com et al
as 2:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment
Defendant:
DIESELSellerz.com, Diesel Power Gear, 4X4 Anything and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. DIESELSellerz.com et al
as 2:2016cv01004
Plaintiff:
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment
Defendant:
DIESELSellerz.com, Diesel Power Gear, 4X4 Anything and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
In re: Theophilus Keaton
as 16-13314
Petitioner:
In re: THEOPHILUS JAMES KEATON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edgar Martin v. United State
as 16-2296
Petitioner:
Edgar Keaton Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
In re: Joshua Berryhill
as 16-12885
Petitioner:
In re: JOSHUA KEATON BERRYHILL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Theophilus Keaton
as 15-11433
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THEOPHILUS JAMES KEATON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
