Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Dawne Gardner v. ATandT Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01891
Defendant:
AT and T Services, Inc., DOES and Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Dawne Gardner
Gardner v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01889
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. and Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Dawne Gardner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Byron Lee v. AT&T Services, Inc./Pacific Bell, et al
as 2:2017cv04642
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., Jaime V. Benavides, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Lee
Sprint Corporation, et al v. FCC, et al
as 17-1126
Petitioner:
Sprint Corporation and Windstream Services, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc.
Gorss Motels Inc. v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Gorss Motels Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. , AT&T Inc. , AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 8:2016mc00022
Defendant:
AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Broadcom Corporation
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 3:2016mc80156
Movant:
Marcos Tzannes
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. , AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC , AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
