Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022mc80297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 22-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF EAST ST. LOUIS, ILLINOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., DISNEY PLATFORM DISTRIBUTION, INC., APPLE INC. and others
Amazon.com Services LLC v. Sacks et al
as 2:2022cv01404
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Defendant:
Joel Sacks and Washington State Department of Labor & Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd et al
as 2:2022cv01396
Petitioner:
Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd
In Re:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Haywood v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Charles Haywood
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0230 Blocking/Screening Offensive Material on Internet
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
Patricia Price and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alfred McZeal v. Amazon.com Services, LLC, et al
as 21-56328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AL MCZEAL, Alfred McZeal, Jr., DBA Smart Walkie Talkie
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, ORION LABS, LLC, JESSE ROBBINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GateGuard, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al.
as 1:2021cv09321
Plaintiff:
GateGuard, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc., Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
