Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Armstrong v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03113
Plaintiff:
Brenda Armstrong , Joby Baker , Latonya Banks and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cady et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-15116
Plaintiff:
Colleen Cady and Raymond Cady
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc.
Cady v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Cady
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Cady v. Jackson et al
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Cady
Defendant:
Brian E Jackson, Brian Jackson, Phillip Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
The State of New York et al v. Town of Clarkstown et al
as 7:2011cv00293
Defendant:
Metal Improvement Co. LLC, Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Pearson Education, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The State of New York and Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Pfizer Inc., Clarkstown Landfill Joint Defense Group, Allied Waste North America Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Marangi Bros., Inc. and Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
AM Cosmetics Corp., Markwins International Corp., Aalborg Instruments & Controls, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carlson et al v. Cady et al
as 4:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
Steven Carlson , Mary Granzow , Richard Kettells and others
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Jean Dickson, Steven J. Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CADY et al v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-86520
Plaintiff:
CADY
Defendant:
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
