Cases 41 - 47 of 47
US v. Lamont Steward
as 09-4978
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMONT D. STEWARD, a/k/a Lamont D. Stewart
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stewart v. DOI
as 08-4020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREVOR D. STEWART, TODD PHILLIPS, JOE PHILLIPS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the Department of the Interior of the United States, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his capacity as Secreatry of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
CANYONLANDS GRAZING CORPORATION and GRAND CANYON TRUST
Not A Party In Lower Court - Amicus Curiae:
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO, COALITION OF ARIZONA/NEW MEXICO COUNTIES FOR STABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS ASSOCIATION and others
Stewart, et al v. DOI, et al
as 07-4200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TREVOR D. STEWART, TODD PHILLIPS, JOE PHILLIPS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the Department of the Interior of the United States, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his capacity as Secreatry of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant-Intervenor:
CANYONLANDS GRAZING CORPORATION and GRAND CANYON TRUST
STEWART v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00814
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. STEWART
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 Civil Actions by Taxpayers for Refund of Taxes
Addleman v. Stewart
as 2:2007mc00050
Petitioner:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr
Respondent:
Belinda D Stewart
Addleman v. Stewart
as 2:2007mc00025
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr
Defendant:
Belinda D Stewart
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
