Cases 41 - 50 of 238
Walter DrummondIn re: Walter Drummond
as 22-13472
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER DRUMMOND
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cole v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00747
Defendant:
Virtus Strategy Trust, Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, Allianz Funds Multi-Strategy Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Emily E. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Clarke v. Meyer et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Kevin Meyer, Shelley Hughes, Tom Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 22-70040
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, DIRECTOR OF NURSING - ESP, HANF, Dr. and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Roberto Durand v. David Drummond, et al
as 21-16967
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID DRUMMOND, DAVID ROGERS and CLARK COUNTY COURT
Drummond v. Bell
as 21-2910
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Drummond
Respondent / Appellee:
Earl Bell, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
Willie Smith v. Aaron Ford, et al
as 21-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON FORD, JAMES DZURENDA, C. DANIELS and others
Albert Medina v. NDOC, et al
as 21-16606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ELY STATE PRISON WARDEN, D. DRUMMOND and others
Walter Drummond v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 21-13206
Petitioner / Appellant:
WALTER DRUMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Johnathan Pinney v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, et al
as 21-2744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
Defendant / Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Drummond, Doctor, Amanda Granger, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
