Cases 41 - 50 of 323,081
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Elyashiv v. Collins Cash Inc.
as 0:2024cv61039
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elyashiv
Defendant:
Collins Cash Inc. doing business as Smart Business Funding
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Elyashiv v. Collins Cash Inc.
as 0:2024cv61038
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elyashiv
Defendant:
Collins Cash Inc. doing business as Smart Business Funding
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lollis v. Rhyo Siding & Restoration, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04985
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lollis
Defendant:
Rhyo Siding & Restoration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Radiance Technologies Inc v. Baker
as 5:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Radiance Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Jade Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Boltier Rand D, Inc. et al v. Henry M. Lee et al
as 8:2024cv01266
Plaintiff:
Boltier R&D, Inc., ADC Energy, Inc., Choe Family LLC and others
Defendant:
Henry M Lee, Johnny Pham, Mika Yamamori and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ennis v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sandre Ennis
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., Crown FDO L.L.C., Asbury Automotive North Carolina Dealership Holdings L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Almowlad et al
as 3:2024cv03627
Plaintiff:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ahmed Ebrahim Almowlad, Kevin Estrada, Falope Fatunmise and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Akramy et al
as 1:2024at00477
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Ramin Akramy, Noor Dahy, Philip Jor-El Anthony Quirino and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
