Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al v. Sondel et al
as 3:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Defendant:
Nimali Sondel and JAMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Mazdeh et al v. Superior Court of CA, Riverside et al
as 3:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Shahla Mazdeh and Asad Abrahamian
Defendant:
Superior Court of CA, Riverside, Office of Administrative Hearings, Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tongring v. Bogart
as 1:2015cv03766
In_re:
Jams Nos. 1340007979 and 1340007982
Petitioner:
Suzanne Tongring
Respondent:
Susan Bogart , Terrance Buehler, Kevin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
USA v. Jimmy Miller, Jr.
as 14-30196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMY GENE MILLER, Jr., AKA Jimmy Jam
Haasan Hijrahannah v. Def Jam Recording
as 14-2790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAASAN H. HIJRAHANNAH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEF JAM RECORDINGS
Devin Copeland v. Justin Bieber
as 14-1653
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN BIEBER, JONATHAN YIP, d/b/a Products of the Street, WB MUSIC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAREIO OVERTON and DEVIN COPELAND, a/k/a De Rico
Defendant:
BIEBER TIME PUBLISHING, LLC
Hijrahannah v. Def Jam Recordings
as 1:2014cv00872
Plaintiff:
Haasan H Hijrahannah
Defendant:
Def Jam Recordings
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Honey-Jam Cafe, LLC v. Jennifer Clark
as 13-8006
Petitioner:
HONEY-JAM CAFE, LLC
Respondent:
JENNIFER CLARK, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated known and unknown
Anderson v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 13-178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alex Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
UMG Recordings, Inc., UMG, Island Def Jam Records, IDJ, Vivendi, UMG Owner and others
McCoy v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Ramere Jam McCoy
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
