Cases 41 - 50 of 9,056
Crispin v. Sussel
as 24-2094
Defendant:
BIGA, Counselor, JOHN DOE, #1, PEIREAULT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSSEAN CRISPIN
Clark v. Hemphill Artworks, LLC
as 24-2078
Defendant:
GEORGE HEMPHILL, JOHN DOES 1-5, MNUCHIN GALLERY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN CLARK
TRAWICK v. WAHIDO LENDING et al
as 1:2024cv01334
Defendant:
WAHIDO LENDING doing business as RIVER VALLEY LOANS, JOHN DOES 1-20, CREDITSERVE, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JANET TRAWICK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ojo v. United States of America
as 24-2055
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Medical Director JOHN DOE #1, Assistant Warden SHIRLEY WHITE and others
Harris et al v. Upwintrade.com et al
as 1:2024cv00313
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Upwintrade.com and David Shamlian
Plaintiff:
Loni Harris and Peter Harris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Walker v. Adams, et al.
as 24-4741
Defendant:
OLIVER, Sgt., Deputy LY, Nurse ALEX DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Walker and JEFFERY WALKER
Evans v. Nelson, et al.
as 24-4713
Defendant:
CARRIE BROSNAN, Pharmacy Technician TRCI, KEVIN HODGES, SHANNON JOHNSTON, TRCI Medical Manager and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES EVANS
Tarbutton v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-4657
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 2, Panama Law Enforcement, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SIVA SAAVEDRA, Panama Law Enforcement, individual and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TARBUTTON
M & M Packaging, Inc. v. Mineo et al
as 1:2024cv05739
Defendant:
Karen Mineo, Jessica Mineo, John Does 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
M & M Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
TRAWICK v. NORTHERN STAR LENDING LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Janet Trawick
Defendant:
Northern Star Lending LLC, Crystal Chapman-Chevalier, Wolf River Development Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
