Cases 41 - 50 of 687
Maroney v. Air Force
as 22-2302
Petitioner:
MICHAEL P. MARONEY
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KORABIK v. USA
as 1:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. KORABIK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bowles & Johnson PLLC v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2022cv06047
Plaintiff:
Bowles & Johnson PLLC
Defendant:
Scott Bernstein, Law Offices of Scott H. Bernstein LLC, Michael Pasquale and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mark Changizi, et al v. HHS, et al
as 22-3573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK CHANGIZI, MICHAEL P. SENGER and DANIEL KOTZIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SURGEON GENERAL VIVEK MURTHY and SECRETARY XAVIER BECERRA
Ardalan v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2022cv03811
Plaintiff:
Khosrow Ardalan, SEB Investment Management AB and West Palm Beach Firefighters Pension Fund
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Charles W. Scharf, Michael P. Santomassimo and others
Petitioner:
Dean Sienna, Fire and Police Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore, Employees Retirement System of Rhode Island and others
Michael Crenshaw v. Brittany Greene
as 22-2098
Applicant:
MICHAEL P. CRENSHAW
Respondent:
BRITTANY GREENE, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Woodd v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03736
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Woodd
Defendant:
MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Antonio O. Garza and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
